I applaud you for your vivid imagination.

Incidentally, the act of classification is not inherently ___ist (sexist, racist, classist, ageist…). You just classified “vile fourth wave man hating feminists,” “intersectional feminists,” “white women,” “black straight women,” “lesbian black women,” and “transgendered black women in a wheel chair.” But that doesn’t necessarily mean that you are sexist or misogynist. It would depend on how you applied that classification (what you used it for) and how accurate it was as a classification.

In all of your responses, I have yet to see a quote from the original article showing that the article classifies all white men as anything, let alone something negative. Every time the word “white” appears, the author refers to “powerful white men.” And she’s not seeking to classify ALL powerful white men, just a particular subset: powerful white men who behave badly but claim to be victims when they are called out for their bad behavior. You may disagree with the author’s assessment of the response of badly behaving powerful white men, but that doesn’t mean the author is sexist.